<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Timesheets : Replicon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://you.arenot.me/2010/01/12/timesheets-should-be-simple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://you.arenot.me/2010/01/12/timesheets-should-be-simple/</link>
	<description>A blog by Colin Wiseman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:30:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pharmacy technician</title>
		<link>http://you.arenot.me/2010/01/12/timesheets-should-be-simple/comment-page-1/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>pharmacy technician</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 04:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://you.arenot.me/?p=42#comment-130</guid>
		<description>nice post. thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice post. thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://you.arenot.me/2010/01/12/timesheets-should-be-simple/comment-page-1/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 21:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://you.arenot.me/?p=42#comment-75</guid>
		<description>Hey thanks for the comments.  I certainly will try it again.  It&#039;s something that is important to me coming from a design agency background - making websites that have been cleverly thought out before a coder hits it, I got to understand what people need before they get what they want if that makes sense?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey thanks for the comments.  I certainly will try it again.  It&#8217;s something that is important to me coming from a design agency background &#8211; making websites that have been cleverly thought out before a coder hits it, I got to understand what people need before they get what they want if that makes sense?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://you.arenot.me/2010/01/12/timesheets-should-be-simple/comment-page-1/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 20:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://you.arenot.me/?p=42#comment-74</guid>
		<description>Hi Colin.

I&#039;m an employee of Replicon.  To be frank with you, you&#039;re right.  The Web Timesheet product has evolved over 10 years of development to be a large, complex, and difficult to use program.  Usability has suffered while the product has been expanded.  On the other hand, it&#039;s flexible and powerful, so it does meet a lot of people&#039;s needs; but I can understand why it doesn&#039;t meet yours.

Thank you for your criticism -- it&#039;s valid, and I believe that the software&#039;s usability will be a big focus in future development.  Please try us again in another year if you&#039;re ever searching for timesheet solutions again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Colin.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m an employee of Replicon.  To be frank with you, you&#8217;re right.  The Web Timesheet product has evolved over 10 years of development to be a large, complex, and difficult to use program.  Usability has suffered while the product has been expanded.  On the other hand, it&#8217;s flexible and powerful, so it does meet a lot of people&#8217;s needs; but I can understand why it doesn&#8217;t meet yours.</p>
<p>Thank you for your criticism &#8212; it&#8217;s valid, and I believe that the software&#8217;s usability will be a big focus in future development.  Please try us again in another year if you&#8217;re ever searching for timesheet solutions again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

