Comments on: Linq to Objects vs Generic List http://you.arenot.me/2010/07/30/linq-to-objects-vs-list/ A blog by Colin Wiseman Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:30:24 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Colin http://you.arenot.me/2010/07/30/linq-to-objects-vs-list/comment-page-1/#comment-337 Colin Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:33:35 +0000 http://you.arenot.me/?p=316#comment-337 I still don't understand regex. Am glad my mate william and my boss do... Congrats on the bike ride...that's massively impressive! Am lucky of I do 200 miles in a life time. I still don’t understand regex. Am glad my mate william and my boss do…

Congrats on the bike ride…that’s massively impressive! Am lucky of I do 200 miles in a life time.

]]> By: Peter Kellner http://you.arenot.me/2010/07/30/linq-to-objects-vs-list/comment-page-1/#comment-336 Peter Kellner Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:00:10 +0000 http://you.arenot.me/?p=316#comment-336 Not sure why, but I never took a liking to findall and the predicate thing. That, and regular expressions seem to hurt my head in a funny way. BTW, on the MVP rant, I also wear a biking shirt that says "Tripple Crown Winner", which means that I've completed 3 or more 200 mile single bike rides in one year. Technically, it should be Tripple Crown Finisher, but that just does not sound as good. Not sure why, but I never took a liking to findall and the predicate thing. That, and regular expressions seem to hurt my head in a funny way.

BTW, on the MVP rant, I also wear a biking shirt that says “Tripple Crown Winner”, which means that I’ve completed 3 or more 200 mile single bike rides in one year. Technically, it should be Tripple Crown Finisher, but that just does not sound as good.

]]> By: Colin http://you.arenot.me/2010/07/30/linq-to-objects-vs-list/comment-page-1/#comment-335 Colin Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:53:32 +0000 http://you.arenot.me/?p=316#comment-335 Hey Peter, I would have thought the FindAll, and in general the generic List methods, would be second nature. I love how easy it is. But of you read my post on interfaces a couple of posts ago, I found out even they are quite inefficient compared to iList and ReadOnly versions...unless you need a List. Am still learning all about performance as my new home grown CMS needs the power...more on that later. Hey Peter,

I would have thought the FindAll, and in general the generic List methods, would be second nature. I love how easy it is. But of you read my post on interfaces a couple of posts ago, I found out even they are quite inefficient compared to iList and ReadOnly versions…unless you need a List.

Am still learning all about performance as my new home grown CMS needs the power…more on that later.

]]> By: Peter Kellner http://you.arenot.me/2010/07/30/linq-to-objects-vs-list/comment-page-1/#comment-334 Peter Kellner Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:19:28 +0000 http://you.arenot.me/?p=316#comment-334 Guilty as charged! I do like LINQ an awful lot and probably go out of my way to use it when it is not always necessary. The FindAll makes more sense, but I don't quite understand the syntax. Guilty as charged! I do like LINQ an awful lot and probably go out of my way to use it when it is not always necessary. The FindAll makes more sense, but I don’t quite understand the syntax.

]]>